06-01-2012, 05:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2012, 07:49 AM by rthrasher2.)
(06-01-2012, 04:37 PM)Graveshow Wrote: Florida face-eater: First reports said "cocaine induced hysteria".
Subsequent reports said "cocaine induced hysteria" OR "bath salts".
Then the man's girlfriend went on the news and said her boyfriend didn't use coke, although she admitted her was a pot smoker, said he was trying to quit and she wished he would stop smoking pot...then she told reporters she thought he had a "voodoo curse" put on him.
At that point, news reports kept saying "bath salts" and dropped the "cocaine induced hysteria" plot. (This was probably bolstered by a report someone found from a Miami newspaper from last year that pointed out that "cocaine induced hysteria" was believed to be a manufactured term to excuse away taser induced death at the hands of police...I guess the veracity of that depends on which side of politics / the law you support)
This morning many news articles started saying it was "bad LSD" ....although some clung to the idea of "bath salts".
The reason I point this out is quite simple: THERE HASNT BEEN ENOUGH TIME FOR A TOXICOLOGY REPORT TO COME BACK.
So who among the authorities keeps feeding the press these varying drug ideas? And WHY?
My bad. I read a report stating that coke and lsd were ruled out, and the bath salts were to blame
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. -John Bernard Books